Hand of the Week, Vol. 2 No. 8




This deal from the Friday 27 March game gave the defenders a chance to shine. Sad to say, none of them (including me, embarrassingly) took advantage of the opportunity.

At all three tables, East was declaring in spades. A typical, though not necessarily recommended, auction was
WestNorthEastSouth
1H
Pass1NT2S3H
3SPassPassPass

leaving South on lead with

S 9 6
H K Q 9 8 6 2
D A J 6
C K 6

Partner has some scattered face cards, but has at most 3 spades and at most 2 hearts, so his values are likely in the minors. The standout opening lead is the CK. A rather shapeless dummy comes down:

S K 7 2
H J T 5
D Q 8 5 4
C 5 4 2

If North knew that this was a doubleton, he could let the king win the first trick, win the next two tricks with the CAQ, and then switch to a heart through declarer's ace. If fact, North doesn't know whether the king is a singleton or a doubleton, so North's most sensible plan is to overtake the king with the ace, cash the queen, and lead the C3 for South to ruff. This is the moment of truth for South: what to lead to trick 4?

Dealer South
EW vul
S T 8 4
H 7 3
D T 7 3
C A Q T 8 3
S K 7 2
H J T 5
D Q 8 5 4
C 5 4 2
[table marker] S A Q J 5 3
H A 4
D K 9 2
C J 9 7
S 9 6
H K Q 9 8 6 2
D A J 6
C K 6

If South is the sort of person who blindly follows suit-preference signals, he'll say to himself, "ah, partner led his smallest club, he wants a diamond shift," and will now play ace and another (preferably the jack) diamond. That would work beautifully if North had the DK. The problem is that just because North said he likes diamonds better than hearts doesn't mean North has the DK. As it turns out, North has no additional face cards anywhere.

A more careful South will realize that if the DAK are cashing, they aren't going anywhere -- but if North doesn't have the DK, taking the DA now may allow declarer to pitch a losing heart on the 13th diamond. South needs to lead the HK at trick four, establishing the setting trick in hearts, while he still has the DA as an entry. Guaranteeing down one, while still getting down two if partner has the king, is much better than setting the contract if partner has the king and letting it make if he doesn't.

Back to HOTW index
Back to Articles index
Back to TaigaBridge home


This page last updated 29.03.09
©2009 Gordon Bower