This hand was randomly dealt at the 10 August session of the Monday evening bridge lesson series. A fine bidding sequence describes North's hand perfectly and leaves South in a position to make a very unusual, but logical, choice of final contract:
K 9 3 A K J 7 K Q 9 6 4 9 | ||
A T 8 7 Q 5 4 A 3 2 7 3 2 |
West | North | East | South |
---|---|---|---|
Pass | |||
Pass | Pass | ||
Pass | Pass | ? |
The
If South had clubs stopped, he would now bid notrump. If he had six spades, he would rebid spades. With only 5 spades, he would want to ask North if he had 3-card support or not. With a notrump-oriented hand but weak clubs (as on the actual deal), he wants to ask North if he has a club stopper.
South can ask both of these questions with his
A South on autopilot will say "OK, we have an 8-card diamond fit and we can't play 3NT. We must belong in
Dealer North None vul |
K 9 3 A K J 7 K Q 9 6 4 9 | |
J 6 5 4 T 8 3 J Q J T 8 5 |
Q 2 9 6 2 T 8 7 5 A K 8 4 | |
A T 8 7 Q 5 4 A 3 2 7 3 2 |
The alternative which you may not have considered: play in your 4-3 spade fit. There are two big advantages to playing in spades: you only need to take 10 tricks rather than 11 to make your contract, and -- more importantly -- you can ruff losing clubs in the hand that started with three trumps, retaining all four in your hand. In general, ruffing in the short trump hand creates an extra winner while ruffing in the long trump hand just uses up a trump winner.
As the cards were actually dealt,
Back to HOTW index
Back to Articles index
Back to TaigaBridge home